[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

kdeinit at 95% CPU ?



I get an intermittent problem my machine
goes real slow, "top" shows ...

  21:03:55 up 20:48,  3 users,  load average: 1.07, 1.30, 1.38
64 processes: 62 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states:  97.2% user,   2.8% system,   0.0% nice,   0.0% idle
Mem:    256364K total,   251132K used,     5232K free,    24460K buffers
Swap:   987988K total,      924K used,   987064K free,   117728K cached

   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
   365 web       14   0  9644 9444  7928 R    95.0  3.6  1235m kdeinit
   446 root       5 -10 81304  15M  4036 S <   1.9  6.0   2:24 XFree86
  1191 web        9   0  9964 9964  8652 S     0.9  3.8   0:00 kdeinit
  1124 root       9   0   956  956   748 S     0.7  0.3   0:01 top
  1232 root      13   0   956  956   748 R     0.7  0.3   0:00 top
  1209 web        9   0 33372  31M 14240 S     0.5 12.6   0:18 mozilla-bin
  1187 web        9   0  7776 7776  7028 S     0.1  3.0   0:00 kdeinit
     1 root       8   0   480  436   416 S     0.0  0.1   0:04 init
     2 root       9   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00 keventd
     3 root      19  19     0    0     0 SWN   0.0  0.0   0:00
ksoftirqd_CPU0
     4 root       9   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00 kswapd
     5 root       9   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00 bdflush
     6 root       9   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00 kupdated
     8 root       9   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00 kjournald
    50 root       9   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00 kapmd
    79 root       9   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00 kjournald
    80 root       9   0     0    0     0 SW    0.0  0.0   0:00 kjournald

kdeinit taking up 95%-98% of process time. What does kdeinit do ?
Initiate kde ? I tried killall kdeinit ... not a good idea, seemed to
stop kde and booted to my graphical kdm loggin.

The only sure fire way is to re-boor linux, Has anyone got any ideas ?

Dave





Reply to: