Re: Samsung ML-1510 - a reasonable printer?
Johannes Zarl <johannes@zarl.at> writes:
> On Thursday 08 May 2003 02:28, JW Park wrote:
>> > My main concern is about being bound to the one and only(tm) printer
>> > driver provided by samsung. Before submitting into this situation I
>> > would like to know, if this driver works without problems..
>>
>> While I don't have any reservations recommanding samsung monitors or tv,
>> thier earlier printers were mechanically unsound version of some so-so
>> Lexmark printers and at one point they withdrew from US printer market.
>> Their current line of printers seem to get better reviews, but Samsung
>> Electronics historically had problems with mechanical stuffs...
>
> Ahh.. One thing more to consider..
>
One thing I can tell you is that some Samsung laser printer models
(small ones, the ones with a thin slit on the front) look an awful lot
like the Lexmark 310/312 of which we have two here at work and the
good news is that they are Postscript printers, the bad news it that
they choke on thin paper, personally I kinda hate them, because the
paper provided by the administration is damn thin and the people that
use the printers can't be bothered to pull out a pice of wrinkled
paper out of the damned things, although, granted, it can get pretty
ugly.
Also they have a little door on the front (similar to the ones in the
Samsungs) for the paper to go out if it following the normal path is
giving you trouble, damned bad design if you ask me.
Any
Reply to: