Re: Kdevelop & htdig
Richard,
I ran into the same problem. Upon being unable to find the modified
version of htdig where /usr/share/doc/kdevelop/README-htdig.Debian said
it was, I assumed the htdig in stable was now modified and so I followed
the rest of the steps. However, it still didn't fully work. The
htdig.conf file is found, but a bunch of "not changed" messages scroll
by as htdig does its work (which may be normal--I'm not sure). But some
of the files like synonyms.db aren't found when I do a help search in
kdevelop. The message says something about a "DB2" error.
I'm wondering if you solved the problem or moved on to kdevelop 3
perhaps? I like to stay with the stable distribution of things when at
all possible due to some bad luck I had a few years ago mixing things
up. Anyone know right off what kind of problems I'll have running
kdevelop 3? And what problems I may have backing kdevelop 3 and
packages it depends on back out? I'm running kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4 that
is part of the stable distribution.
Thanks,
Kris
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
To: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Kdevelop & htdig
From: Richard Hector <rhector@paradise.net.nz>
Date: 27 Jan 2003 22:06:06 +1300
Old-return-path: <rhector@paradise.net.nz>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------
Hi all,
I have problems right at the end (I think) of Kdevelop Setup - it wants
to use htdig to index all the docs (and I think that's a good idea), but
complains about the lack of a htdig.conf file.
>From googling, I've discovered that at least at one stage, a README
file
on this topic existed in /usr/share/doc/kdevelop (which it doesn't now),
which said a custom version of htdig was required. An examples directory
was also there, with the conf file.
Does the fact that these things are missing from the package I've just
installed mean that this issue has changed, and it should all work
smoothly, or has the package just lost some docs along the way, and I
should follow the archived docs I found on the web?
Thanks,
Richard
Reply to: