Re: Query: what's best low-profile WWW gui-UA for Debian?
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 02:55:57PM -0400, Soren Andersen wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> > I have thus far been using lynx for visiting HTML data. I'd like to move
> > to a graphical browser. I seek input, insight, well-formed informed
> > opinions about which graphical WWW ua package to install or build (I am
> > not afraid of my cc ...). Which should it be? Who requires the least
> > additional prerequisite packages above and beyond xlibs, I guess, and
> > maybe the Athena widget set, maybe ... can Mozilla be built in a modest
> > configuration or is it a hog? Opera (I know, non-free software ...)?
> > Netscape?
> i think mozilla and netscape are hogs. i dont like opera as it is
> non-free. phoenix seems reasonable
> sandip p deshmukh
> FORTUNE PROVIDES QUESTIONS FOR THE GREAT ANSWERS: #4
> A: Go west, young man, go west!
> Q: What do wabbits do when they get tiwed of wunning awound?
Phoenix/Firebird is Mozilla-based, so it is certainly not lightweight.