Re: samba: authentication through pam?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Apr 11, 2003 at 01:41:33AM -0700, nate wrote:
> yes but its probably not a good idea. In order for samba to use
> PAM, you must disable password encryption on both the server AND
> all the clients. This has to do with the way pam works, it doesn't
> return the actual password that PAM recieved, it just returns a
> response, so samba cannot recieve the encrypted password or something.
Yuck...I'm amazed samba doesn't grok PAM...are there any SMB daemons
that work with PAM in a sane manner?
- --
.''`. Baloo Ursidae <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
: :' : proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+lo9kJ5vLSqVpK2kRAvHZAKDJaeCzvcZ/S+V3DL9jQyVKw/gYQACg4cZQ
i+qYDODrFEyROch8v0eh3Xg=
=G9NV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: