[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Partitioning for Speed



On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 04:17:05PM -0800, Jeff wrote:
> I've seen a reference to two regarding the location of a partition on
> the HDD being faster than other parts of the HDD.  I've been trying to
> get a definitive answer on this and it's still not clear to me.  
> 
> 1.  What part of the HDD is faster, the inside (closest to the center
>     of the platter) or the outside?
> 
>     It makes some sense to me that the outside would be faster due the
>     fact that it's moving faster, but this may not be a determining
>     factor.

I think, in order to get faster access to data in the HD, considering 
the available filesystems would be much better:
- reiserfs for fast access (on small files); it is fast, and I use it. 
But when reiserfsck couldn't fix the journal, the filesystem would be 
gone.
- ext3fs for compatibility (with ext2fs); not as fast as reiserfs, I
believe; the journal file can be turned off/on, so basically you have
both filesystems all the time.
- xfs for fast access (on large files); this is what people say on this 
list.
 
> 2.  When using cfdisk to partition, does it start the first partition
>     by default at the beginning, or on the inside, of the HDD?  

It should be at the beginning.
 
> My intention here is to learn about the HDD and partitioning for
> speed in general.  My purpose is general usage, nothing specific.

I believe that partitioning for speed is a bit unusable; the difference 
is hardly noticeable. And speaking about swapfiles, it would be lots 
nicer to get bigger memory.

Oki



Reply to: