[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: installing emacs21 (woody)



Hello!
i have tried this:

> Do this:
> 
> apt-get clean
> apt-get install xemacs21-mule
> 

but i get a simular message:

Setting up xemacs21-mule (21.4.6-8) ...
emacs-install xemacs21
emacsen-common: Handling install of emacsen flavor xemacs21
emacsen-common: byte-compiling for xemacs21
cp: cannot stat `/etc/emacs/site-start.d/00debian-vars.el': No such file or
directory
emacs-install: /usr/lib/emacsen-common/packages/install/emacsen-common
xemacs21
failed at /usr/lib/emacsen-common/emacs-install line 28, <TSORT> line 1.
dpkg: error processing xemacs21-mule (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 29
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of xemacs21:
 xemacs21 depends on xemacs21-mule (= 21.4.6-8) | xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn
 (= 21.4.6-8) | xemacs21-nomule (= 21.4.6-8) | xemacs21-gnome-mule (=
 21.4.6-8) | xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn (= 21.4.6-8) |
 xemacs21-gnome-nomule (= 21.4.6-8); however:
  Package xemacs21-mule is not configured yet.
  Package xemacs21-mule-canna-wnn is not installed.
  Package xemacs21-nomule is not installed.
  Package xemacs21-gnome-mule is not installed.
  Package xemacs21-gnome-mule-canna-wnn is not installed.
  Package xemacs21-gnome-nomule is not installed.
dpkg: error processing xemacs21 (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of xemacs21-bin:
 xemacs21-bin depends on xemacs21 (= 21.4.6-8); however:
  Package xemacs21 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing xemacs21-bin (--configure):
 dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Errors were encountered while processing:
 xemacs21-mule
 xemacs21
 xemacs21-bin
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Any thoughts?

Thanks!
Bjoern

-- 
Bjoern Schiessle              <devnull@schiessle.org>
http://www.schiessle.org      jabber-ID: BeS@jabber.org
[ Standing up to an evil system is exhilarating.        ] 
[            --Richard Stallman                         ]



Reply to: