Re: default editor
Will Yardley <email@example.com> writes:
> The patch (to init.c) seems to be:
> Tempdir = safe_strdup ((p = getenv ("TMPDIR")) ? p : "/tmp");
> - Editor = safe_strdup ((p = getenv ("EDITOR")) ? p : "vi");
> + Editor = safe_strdup ((p = getenv ("EDITOR")) ? p : "/usr/bin/editor");
> Visual = safe_strdup ((p = getenv ("VISUAL")) ? p : Editor);
Either I'm blind, or that should obey VISUAL if set, otherwise
EDITOR, otherwise /usr/bin/editor....
[installs mutt, tries
EDITOR="echo EDITOR" VISUAL="echo VISUAL" mutt firstname.lastname@example.org
Hmm... the Debian unstable package seems to work as expected for me.
Sure you don't have something weird in your environment or something?
> Alan Shutko <email@example.com>:
>> Some programs use VISUAL, some EDITOR, some both... the distinction
>> between them has long been lost.
> Perhaps, but EDITOR is supposed to be your line editor, and VISUAL your
> full screen editor, or at least that's what I've always been told.
Sure. But that distinction hasn't really been meaningful for at
least a decade, and people writing programs these days don't
necessarily follow it.
Alan Shutko <firstname.lastname@example.org> - I am the rocks.
Looking for a developer in St. Louis? http://web.springies.com/~ats/
I got lost in a nursery once. - Richie Ryan