Re: TELNET

To: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: TELNET
From: Nathan E Norman <nnorman@incanus.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 08:27:59 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030314142759.GD15175@incanus.net>
Mail-followup-to: Debian-User <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 3E71C070.4020208@esoterica.pt>
References: <[🔎] 3e71a081e9031@wp.pl> <[🔎] 20030314102243.GZ30054@ursine.dyndns.org> <[🔎] 3E71C070.4020208@esoterica.pt>

On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 11:43:44AM +0000, Joao Paulo wrote:
> telnet is also very good (but for other things).
>    telnet host 25
>    telnet host 21
>    ...

Yuck.  Use 'nc' from the netcat package instead.

-- 
Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:nnorman@incanus.net
  Great minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, small
  minds discuss people.
          -- Laurence J. Peter

Reply to:

References:
- TELNET
  - From: Łukasz Milewski <milewski7@wp.pl>
- Re: TELNET
  - From: Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org>
- Re: TELNET
  - From: Joao Paulo <jserrachinha@esoterica.pt>

Prev by Date: Re: Onboard rtl8139 works in 2.2 kernel but not in 2.4 kernel, please help
Next by Date: Re: Source for 2.2.20 kernel
Previous by thread: Re: TELNET
Next by thread: Re: TELNET
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread