[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: buy or build computer?



On Sun, 2003-03-09 at 12:55, Peter Christensen wrote:
> My five-year-old Gateway Pentium 200 MHz died recently.  (It won't boot from
> the hard drive or a rescue disk, and it won't go into bios-setup mode.)  I
> don't think it's fixable, and anyway, it was so slow that it's probably time
> to replace it.  Temporarily I'm using a borrowed computer with Win95.  Yuck!
> 
> For my next computer I want to make sure that everything is compatible with
> Linux.  I searched this list and found a few posts about buying computers.
> They were a little old (one or two years), so I'm wondering if the situation
> has changed.  A few people recommended the AMD Athlon processor over
> Pentiums.  And Matrox for video, Soundblaster or Ensoniq for sound.  Any
> thoughts on this?
> 
> I've heard that computers nowadays are built with the cheapest possible
> components, so I was wondering if building it myself would be a good idea.
> It might not be much cheaper than buying one from Dell or Gateway, but if
> the result was a better quality machine it might be worthwhile.  So far I've
> only had to replace broken components in my Gateway, such as the hard drive
> and CDrom, also added memory.  Building a computer would be a challenge, but
> I think I'd enjoy doing it...

In addition to "buy" or "build from scratch", there is a middle way:
buy a bare bones system (mobo installed in case with maybe a CPU), and 
then you install everything else.  This is the way I prefer to go.

-- 
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr.        mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net          |
| Jefferson, LA  USA      http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson  |
|                                                               |
| Spit in one hand, and wish for peace in the other.            |
| Guess which is more effective...                              |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+



Reply to: