[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bad Debian (L.A.H.)



On Sunday 09 March 2003 18:10, J. Lambrecht wrote:
> "From : Linux Administrator Handbook p.35 (Prentice Hall,2002) "
>
> Debian startup scripts
>
> If SuSE is the ultimate example of a well-designed, well-executed plan
> for the management of startup scripts, Debian is the exact opposite. The
> Debian scripts are fragile, undocumented, and unbelievably incosistent.
> Sadly, it appears that the lack of a standard way of setting up scripts
> has resulted in chaos in this case. Bad Debian!

I don't know what the author of that stuff been smoking, but I have to say 
that I was not impressed when I saw the SuSE scripts the last time. I didn't 
like the way they're using centralized configuration. Perhaps it's just a 
matter of taste and the author was still too much into Windows? Who knows...

> Does anyone now if the SuSE startup scripts would work on Debian, or are
> there more well-planned startupscripts available for Debian.

The SuSE scripts probably won't work because (if they still use that system) 
are absed on some central configuration files that control whether services 
are started and their options.

-- 
Got Backup?



Reply to: