Nathan E Norman wrote:
I thought that was just a coincidence. It's even funnier knowing you intended it.On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 05:46:57PM -0500, Mike Dresser wrote:On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Nathan E Norman wrote:Actually, I never saw the original but I did see the response. That made me angry, very angry indeed.http://www.angelfire.com/pa/lkmarvin/images/angry.wavGlad someone got it :-)
Kent