Re: [OT] Actually Way OT - Debian version names

To: "deFreese, Barry" <Barry.deFreese@nike.com>
Cc: "'debian-user@lists.debian.org'" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [OT] Actually Way OT - Debian version names
From: Joe Lillibridge <joe@nmsu.edu>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2003 10:23:28 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 310A5691-45C1-11D7-92FD-000393BB6FA4@nmsu.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 2D14766B2568D611A80B0008C733F3DD0163208B@foothill-svr-03.nike.com>


On Friday, February 21, 2003, at 09:55  AM, deFreese, Barry wrote:

OK, this is probably a newbie question and maybe it has been coveredbefore
but it's been buggin' me for a while.
So we have Potato, Woody, Sid, Sarge. Are the Debian folks Toy Storyfans
or is it just coincidence?

Thanks!

Not a coincidence -http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-ftparchives.en.html#s-codenames


--
Joe Lillibridge <joe@nmsu.edu>

Reply to:

References:
- [OT] Actually Way OT - Debian version names
  - From: "deFreese, Barry" <Barry.deFreese@nike.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Actually Way OT - Debian version names
Next by Date: Re: [OT] Actually Way OT - Debian version names
Previous by thread: Re: [OT] Actually Way OT - Debian version names
Next by thread: Re: [OT] Actually Way OT - Debian version names
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread