[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Gimp Print Problem



On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 10:45:28AM -0500, Thomas H. George wrote:
>
> > 
> > It is not clear from your message whether you have gotten your USB set
> > up properly. What output do you get to "cat /proc/bus/usb/devices" and
> > "cat /proc/bus/usb/drivers"? 
> 
> 
> T:  Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=00 Cnt=01 Dev#=  2 Spd=12  MxCh= 0
> D:  Ver= 1.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs=  1
> P:  Vendor=04b8 ProdID=0005 Rev= 1.00
> S:  Manufacturer=EPSON
> S:  Product=USB Printer
> S:  SerialNumber=w21080004150213140
> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=c0 MxPwr=  2mA
> I:  If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=07(print) Sub=01 Prot=02 Driver=usblp
> E:  Ad=01(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=0ms
> E:  Ad=82(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=  64 Ivl=0ms

I would expect "cat /proc/bus/usb/devices" to list your root
hub. Check /proc/pci for hint as to whether your hub is UHCI or
OHCI. If your hub is UHCI and you are using usb-uhci module, try using
uhci module or vice versa.

> 
> 
>          usbdevfs
>          hub
>          prism2_usb
>   0- 15: usblp
> 
> > 
> > According the http://www.linux-usb.org/USB-guide/book1.html, the usb
> > printer device should be /dev/usb/lp0. Below you indicate you are
> > using /dev/usblp0 as as printer device. Typo? What is the output of "ls -l
> > /dev/usblp0"? 
> >
> 
> 
> crw-rw-rw-    1 root     root     180,   0 Jan 24  2002 /dev/usblp0

Usual Debian setup would have ownership root.lp with premissions
crw-rw----. I don't think this matters since you have world read-write
premission set.
 
> 
> > What does "lp /usr/share/cups/data/testprint.ps" print? Any error
> > messages?
> 
> The printer prints the color octogon and L's previously described.
> There are no error messages - that is grep error error_log and grep
> false error_log return nothing.  error_log exists and contains 1704
> lines - I erased all the previous entries before running this test.
> 

-- 
Jerome

Attachment: pgpNVd097Ecmj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: