[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GNOME == bloatware?



On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 10:05:20AM -0800, Steve Juranich wrote:
> I'm sure I'm not the only one to notice this, as I'm running a stock 
> sid box.  But I've got a machine with 256Mb ram, but GNOME is bringing 
> this system to a crawl.  I open up the system monitor, and I see that 
> the main offenders are X (65 Mb, totally expected), Galeon (40 MB, it 
> didn't used to be this bad), and gnome-terminal (15 MB for a single 
> instance! 11MB after I turn off all of the fancy stuff).
> 
> So I'm wondering if I've got some binaries that aren't optimized for my 
> system somehow, or this is just the state of GNOME.  If so, I'm going 
> to take a serious second look at ditching the whole 'desktop 
> environment' altogether and go with something like IceWM.
> 
> I'm not trolling, I've got a serious issue here.  256 mb should be more 
> than enough to run all of the junk I want to run without swapping.

This is why I went back to windowmaker.  I thought gnome looked really
cool, but between fixing the breakage caused by fast moving
development, bugs, interesting packaging (by debian maintainer and/or
Ximian), dependency hell, and the performance, it's just not for me.

YMMV.

-- 
Nathan Norman - Incanus Networking mailto:nnorman@incanus.net
  If you don't know what your program is supposed to do, you'd
  better not start writing it.
          -- Edsger Dijkstra



Reply to: