[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Exim + Procmail + Cyrus



The more I think about it, the more it appears to me as a bug in
cyrdeliver. Do you have the courage to file a bug ?

	Xav

Le dim 01/12/2002 à 23:12, David Ellis a écrit :
> Thanks a bunch, that got it.
> 
> This procmail thing is extremely cool.
> 
> - David
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Xavier Bestel" <xavier.bestel@free.fr>
> To: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
> Sent: Sunday, December 01, 2002 2:36 PM
> Subject: Re: Exim + Procmail + Cyrus
> 
> 
> > Yes, I've run into this. I remember cyrdeliver doesn't like the "From "
> > header, so I solved it by adding this to the top of .procmailrc:
> >
> > :0 f
> > | formail -I "From "
> >
> > I think it'll work better.
> >
> > Xav
> >
> > Le dim 01/12/2002 à 20:19, David Ellis a écrit :
> > > First off I'm a relative Debian Newbie, but I've been using Linux, Unix
> and
> > > Windows Systems for in excess of 13 years. General rule of thumb, assume
> I
> > > know nothing :)
> > >
> > > Anyhoo, I've got a pretty sweet exim + cyrus configuration going and I'm
> > > happy with it - so I thought I'd plug procmail into it and do some nifty
> > > filtering.
> > >
> > > My .procmailrc is as follows:
> > >
> > > SHELL="/bin/sh"
> > > DELIVERMAIL="/usr/sbin/cyrdeliver"
> > > LOGFILE="$HOME/.maillog"
> > > IMAP="$DELIVERMAIL -e -q -m user.david"
> > > LOGABSTRACT="all"
> > > VERBOSE=ON
> > >
> > > :0
> > > |$IMAP
> > >
> > > This results in a procmail error when it executes cyrdeliver to the tune
> of
> > > "Invalid Message Header". I've ensured that the user account in question
> can
> > > run cyrdeliver (so it's not a permissioning issue).
> > >
> > > Has anyone successfully set this up? Any pointers possible templates for
> the
> > > .procmailrc file? Pointers?
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
> >
> 



Reply to: