Re: Ext3 vs. ReiserFS
Hi,
I know only about problem-free conversion ext2-> ext3 (in fact it's only
addition of the journal), but I'm affraid that extX <-> reiserFS (or JFS, or
other) are to different, so it must be formatted, maybe on some site of
reiserfs they would have some tips.
sorry
Matej
On Monday 25 November 2002 09:52, Sandip P Deshmukh wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 09:44:02AM +0100, Mat?j Hausenblas wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I'm using ReiserFS and I've read an article in Linux Magazine (issue
> > october 2002 but now it's not online yet
> > http://www.linux-mag.com/2002-10/toc.html ) And understood some things.
> > Ext3 is a journaling patch on ext2, so the properties of ext2 could be
> > seen in it's performance. ReiserFS is about 6 times quicker than ext2
> > (don't know if also than ext3) and it's size-recovery are better.
>
> is there way in which i can convert my existing ext3 filesystem to
> reiserfs?
>
> is there a way to convert it back if i find reiserfs not suitable?
Reply to: