[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cramfs: wrong magic, kernel panic



Let me clarify.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eduard Bloch" <edi@gmx.de>
To: "Neal Pollock" <npollock@rogers.com>
Cc: <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 6:06 AM
Subject: Re: cramfs: wrong magic, kernel panic

> > Partition check:
> >  /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: [PTBL] [4866/255/63] p1 p3 < p5 p6 p7
>
> >  /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0: [PTBL] [1046/255/63] p1 p2 p3 p4 < p5
p6
> > p7 >
>
> What is that? Same disk with different partition tables? Burried your
> part. table somehow?

The first disk ( p1 p3 <p5 p6 p7>) is hda and contains only fat32 partitions
strictly for win2k.
The second disk (p1 p2 p3 p4 < p5 p6 p7>) is hdb and contains my ext2, ext3
and swap partitions for debian.

> > cramfs: wrong magic
>
> That's the autoprobing. Seems like your filesystem has not been
> recognized.
>
> > Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 3:46
>
> What is that? What does the kernel look on "/dev/hda46"? Try with
> root=/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part

Tried it.  Got the following:
'Kernel panic: I have no root and I want to scream' ???

> > request_module[nls_cp437]: Root fd not mounted
> > Unable to load NLS charset cp437
> > VFS: Mounted root (msdos filesystem) readonly.
>
> Huch, what is 3:46?
>
> > Freeing unused kernel memory: 72k freed
> > Warning: unable to open an initial console.
> > Kernel panic: No init found.  Try passing init= option to kernel.
>
> It has mounted the wrong partition. Get a rescue system (you can use the
> install disk as a such one, second console) to make researches.
>
> > partitions are on /dev/hda and linux boots from /dev/hdb. Could I have
reset
> > the computer while lilo was writing to the bootsector?
>
> YOU must know this.

I couldn't see anything as my screen was blank.

> Gruss/Regards,
> Eduard.
> --
> 'Und dann muß man den Computer herunterladen, sonst stürzt er ab.'
>                                                  (Harald Schmidt)
>



Reply to: