Re: OT: UML (Re: UML Modeling w/o Rational Rose)
I'M NOT MEMER OF YOUR MAILING LISTS. MY MAIL IS : PONIK@POBOX.SK
(PONIK@PROVER.SK IS ONLY FORWARD FROM PONIK@POBOX.SK).
WHY THIS MAILS COME TO ME?
EVERY DAY COME TO ME 200 MAILS FROM YOUR MAILING LISTS.
CAN YOU DO SOMETHING WITH IT?
THANK YOU.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra" <lgcdutra@terra.com.br>
To: "Oleg" <oleg@tw304h3.cpmc.columbia.edu>; "Debian Users"
<debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: Re: OT: UML (Re: UML Modeling w/o Rational Rose)
> Oleg escreveu:
> >
> > What do you get from UML, that you don't get from class definitions (in
> > header files) ?
>
> UML has a much bigger scope, since it tries to account for all the design
> phase, including data modelling.
>
> Unfortunately it's a fundamentally flawed approach, as shown in
> http://dbdebunk.com./cjd4a.htm.
>
>
> --
> _
> / \ Leandro Guimarães Faria Corsetti Dutra +41 (21) 216 15 93
> \ / http://homepage.mac.com./leandrod/ fax +41 (21) 216 19 04
> X http://tutoriald.sf.net./ Orange Communications CH
> / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign against HTML email +41 (21) 216 15 93
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: