[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: <img src="http://ippath/photo.jpg"> not work,



telnet localhost 80

GET /file HTTP/1.0


(Thats ENTER, ENTER.)

What happens then? Look in the access.log and error.log as well.

You might want to tag a | less on the end of the telnet line, if you need
to scroll.

Try that and see what happens.

-- 
Brad Lay (brad@samford.net)
Systems Administrator

Samford Net
P) +61 7 3855 2233
F) +61 7 3289 5458
W) http://www.samford.net

"You will contract a disease for which the cure
 is so expensive that you will die of poverty."

On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, eric lin wrote:

>
>
> Thomas Braun wrote:
> > eric lin wrote:
> >
> >> www:/home/fsshl# iptables -L -nv
> >> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> >>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source destination
> >>
> >> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> >>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source destination
> >>
> >> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> >>  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source destination
> >>
> >> ---------------
> >> my iptables is just install from apt-get install  (unstable)
> >>
> >> www:/home/fsshl# ipchains -L -nv
> >> ipchains: Incompatible with this kernel
> >> my ipchains is 1.3.10,  kernel is 2.4.20
> >>
> >> Plese help why my iptables show nothing?
> >
> >
> > I think this is not a Firewall problem,there are no Firewall rules, what
> > tells you your access.log or error.log?
>
> my access log  have 304 and 404 error
> when It try to access that <img src "http://ipath/file'>
>
>
> www:/var/log/apache# iptables -t nat -Lnv
> iptables: Table does not exist (do you need to insmod?)
> www:/var/log/apache# insmod iptables
> insmod: iptables: no module by that name found
> www:/var/log/apache#
>
>
>
> > what tells you iptables -t nat -Lnv
> >
>
> it indeed is difficult for me to realize what is that mean
> highly apprecaite your reply, and hope to see more
>
> >
> > cu thomas
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >> highly apprecaite , Eric
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>



Reply to: