[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PPoE support in 2.4 series kernel



On Tue, 17 Dec 2002 07:24:48 +1100
Sam Varghese <sam@gnubies.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> I'm looking to compile a kernel with PPoE support so I downloaded the
> latest source available with testing (2.4.19) but I find that the PPoE
> option stays greyed out no matter what other networking options I
> include.
> 
> I was under the distinct impression that the 2.4 series has support for
> PPoE - am I wrong? If so, can someone point me to a patch for the
> required support?
>From my config
# Ethernet (1000 Mbit)
#
---- snipped -----
# CONFIG_PLIP is not set
CONFIG_PPP=y
# CONFIG_PPP_MULTILINK is not set
# CONFIG_PPP_FILTER is not set
CONFIG_PPP_ASYNC=y
CONFIG_PPP_SYNC_TTY=y
CONFIG_PPP_DEFLATE=y
CONFIG_PPP_BSDCOMP=y
CONFIG_PPPOATM=y
# CONFIG_SLIP is not set

This is the relevant portion (i think) from my kernel config for 2.4.19
For more detailed help, download the rp-pppoe sources for kernel 2.4.x from www.roaringpenguin.com/pppoe and read the doc/KERNEL-MODE-PPPOE after you untar it (version 3.5 rp-pppoe at least)... basically he outlines the kernel config options you will need and recommends installing ppp fresh from source.  Let me know if you still have problems and I will try to help.  Are you using "make menuconfig" to do your kernel options selection?

HTH
Shawn
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sam
> - -- 
> Sam Varghese
> http://www.gnubies.com
> Experiences are savings which a miser puts aside. Wisdom is an inheritance which
> a wastrel cannot exhaust.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux)
> 
> iD8DBQE9/jaPZyXhknb+33gRAoX5AJ4jcqUY1XRRgfRbFSILLhjXbYjyIACdGK6G
> 3z6Y/S72y4e/hJ8GBLPX2Lg=
> =zhcO
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 


-- 
Shawn Lamson
shawn.lamson@verizon.net
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0



Reply to: