Re: Partition size
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 12:52, Mike Dresser wrote:
> On 28 Nov 2002, Richard Hector wrote:
>
> > You could use the linear version, where you just concatenate the
> > partitions together. That shouldn't take any longer to seek over than
> > one big one - each byte is still only in one place.
> >
> > Richard
>
> Well, wouldn't the raid partition be bigger than 6 gig, defeating the
> whole purpose of having under 6 gig partitions?
I guess so. I was thinking, in an unclear sort of fashion, that you
could fsck them seperately - but now you mention it, I suppose that's
impractical.
Richard
Reply to: