Re: Why sid instead of sarge??
On Tue, 2002-11-26 at 14:12, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 02:49:47AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
[snip]
> Weird. I just tried it and I also get the unstable version. However,
> there is a workaround:
>
> Use `apt-cache showpkg pan' to find out what the available versions
> are; I see:
>
> Versions:
> 0.13.1-5(/var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.midco.net_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages)
> 0.13.0-4(/var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.midco.net_debian_dists_testing_main_binary-i386_Packages)
> 0.11.2-1(/var/lib/apt/lists/mirrors.midco.net_debian_dists_woody_main_binary-i386_Packages)
>
> So, 0.13.0-4 is the version you want. To get it, do
>
> apt-get source pan=0.13.0-4
>
> I'm looking for the reference, but I remember reading that `apt-get
> source' doesn't work the same way as `apt-get install' WRT the -t
> switch and pinning.
>
> Hope this helps,
>
That did help. Thank you!! One more question, though. It's my
understanding that in order to, for example, change the cc from
gcc to gcc-3.2 and add compiler optimisations, you must edit
debian/rules. Is this true?
--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://members.cox.net/ron.l.johnson |
| |
| "they love our milk and honey, but preach about another |
| way of living" |
| Merle Haggard, "The Fighting Side Of Me" |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: