Re: xv?

[Michael West <web@mitzit.net>]

On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:11:55AM -0500, Gregory Seidman wrote:
> Is there a policy reason why there is no xv package, or is it just that no
> one has bothered to package it?
> 
> --Greg
> 
I prefer xzgv

from http://xzgv.browser.org/ :

xzgv differs from other picture viewers for X in that it uses one window
for both the file selector and viewer, it (unlike xv) allows both
scrolling and fit-to- window methods of viewing large pictures, and it
(unlike xv and some others) doesn't ever mangle the picture's aspect
ratio without you telling it to.

and it is in main

     ~Michael