On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 09:38, Patrick Kirk wrote: > Hi all, > > Wierd dependency - zendapi-20010901 does not look like a Debian product name. It is. According to the policy, http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-versions.html#s4.1, if the upstream package has a date-based versioning system, the Debian package should have the same. Even if the New Maintainers' Guide does state that the maintainer should prepend 0.0. to the date/version, that can be handled by epochs. > php4-domxml depends on zendapi-20010901 > zendapi-20010901 does not appear to be available > > I'm at a loss here - has anyone any idea on what I can do about this? The above being said, I'm not sure how that applies to virutal packages. What I do know is that zendapi-20020429 is provided by php4. You should try to apt-get update and install php4 again. I think. ;-) -- PGP public key: http://www.wolfheart.ro/pubkey.asc
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part