routing problem
hi
now i believe myself to be a fairly experienced deb user. this is
humiliating:
i have a home network (10.42.42.0) which has a floppyfw gateway to the
world at 10.42.42.254. works.
i have been building a cluster (actually, resuscitating one, but that's
another story). the cluster network is 10.42.43.0. its gateway is
called buster and has 2 nics, 10.42.42.112 (eth0) and 10.42.43.254
(eth1).
the cluster nodes (only 3 running now) are c0n1 c0n2 and c0n3. they are
served their roots by buster (etherboot). works. that was hard. this is
easy?
too bad i can't ping in or out.
from inside out:
c0n1:/home/dmallery>> route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
10.42.43.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 10.42.43.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
cluster member c0n1 can ping buster, but no further.
next here's buster:
buster:/etc/init.d>> route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse Iface
10.42.43.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1
10.42.42.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 10.42.42.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
buster can ping into the cluster and outwards into 10.42.42.0 land.
buster is happy. buster can even ping debian.org!
next (and last) here's bilbo, a sarge machine on the home front:
bilbo:/>> route -n
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Iface
10.42.43.0 10.42.42.112 255.255.255.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
10.42.42.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
0.0.0.0 10.42.42.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0
bilbo can ping the world and buster but not into the cluster.
(i realize that i will have to add a route to the firewall to the cluster
but that can wait till c0n1 can ping bilbo!)
is this a routing problem, or am i looking endlessly in the wrong place?
i am at a dead stop. i would so appreciate some pointers.
thanks in advance.
dave
--
Dave Mallery, K5EN (debian testing & woody)
PO Box 520 .~. _ Ramah, NM 87321
/V\ -o)
no gates... /( )\ /\\ running Debian GNU/Linux
no windows! ^^^^^ _\_v free at last!
Reply to: