Re: apache-perl vs HTML::Mason

["Keith G. Murphy" <keithmur@mindspring.com>]

Bob Proulx wrote:
> will trillich <will@serensoft.com> [2002-09-29 23:30:31 -0500]:
>
> > okay, apt-get is wonderful and all that -- but when sticking
> > with a tried-and-true potato setup, it's hard to get feature
> > updates without some extra-apt activity...
>
>
> Wait, wait, wait.  Did you say "sticking with a tried-and-true potato"
> and "features updates" in the same sentence?  Uh, excuse me?  Shock,
> horror, amazement!  Stunned silence.
>
> Living on CPAN is almost equivalent to living on unstable.  If you
> feel CPAN unstable is good, why not Debian unstable?  To my way of
> thinking that is an inconsistent viewpoint.
For that matter, egads, man, woody is *stable*.

Potato is just plain obsolete.

Sheesh, I though I was conservative.

Seriously, try to upgrade to woody, even if it is a production server.