Re: Reiserfs stability??
#include <hallo.h>
* nate [Fri, Aug 23 2002, 11:18:42AM]:
> >> since reiserfs is the only stable journalling filesystem that I
> >> am aware of for 2.2.x that is why I use it. And it is probably the
> >
> > Then your recherches were not good enough. Ext3 for 2.2.x has been
> > existed for a long while.
>
> I am aware of that, note that i said STABLE journalling filesystem,
>
> http://people.spoiled.org/jha/ext3-faq.html
>
> "There is no development going into ext3 for 2.2 anymore. "
>
> that FAQ was updated 2002-07-03. Which is not that long ago. I don't
Who cares? It is Yet Another Hey-People-I-Show-U-How-To-Use-EXT3-FAQ,
one of dozens available in the net.
> consider a piece of kernel code that is no longer maintained
*scratch*, *scratch* Why didn't you consider that Ext3 for 2.2.x has not
needed upgrades for a year since there are no important bugs? On the
other hand, ugly things in ReiserFS code come to daylight again and
again, so upgrades are important.
> to be stable, especially something as new as ext3.
Ext3 is not really new. It is based on the codebase of Ext2 of 2.2.x
series.
Gruss/Regards,
Eduard.
--
As of next week, passwords will be entered in Morse code.
Frank Knappe in debian-user-de
Reply to: