[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: silly testing/sid question



On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 11:46:33AM +0800, Alwyn Schoeman wrote:
> I was wondering, for those of us using testing and unstable in our
> sources.list files?  When woody goes from frozen to stable, will sid
> being the current unstable just suddenly become testing?  So if you keep
> your entries at 'testing' you will be updated to the files that was in
> 'unstable' just before woody became stable?

Sid is always unstable:
http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-ftparchives.html#s-sid

The entries that are in unstable will just trickle into the new testing
just like they normally do (but now isn't normally).

> If so, is there any issues with not having a dist-upgrade?

If you keep your sources.list at testing, you will need a dist-upgrade
every once in a while. An example from unstable: the package dictd was
split into 2 packages (dictd && dictzip), and dictd now depends upon
dictzip. The only way for the package dictd can upgrade to the new
version is with a dist-upgrade to install the new package.

-- 
Seneca
seneca-cunningham@rogers.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: