RE: How stable is dual head, twin view feature ?

To: tvn1981 <tvn1981@flashmail.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: How stable is dual head, twin view feature ?
From: "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <shalehperry@attbi.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 17:03:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-id: <[🔎] XFMail.20020622170300.shalehperry@attbi.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020622184229.014d5249.tvn1981@flashmail.com>

> 
> So just wondering if it's just me that has problems with twinview stuff ?  Or
> is there any other settings that you would recommend - how well is Matrox
> G400 or Agp+PCI settings ?  they run well ? 
> 

I use a dual head matrox card every day.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: How stable is dual head, twin view feature ?
  - From: Paul Mackinney <paul@mackinney.net>

References:
- How stable is dual head, twin view feature ?
  - From: tvn1981 <tvn1981@flashmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#150574: apache: SECUIRITY Apache 1.3.24-3 (Testing) contains chunk encoding buffer overflow
Next by Date: Re: console=/dev/ttyN
Previous by thread: How stable is dual head, twin view feature ?
Next by thread: Re: How stable is dual head, twin view feature ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread