Re: PAM and exim redux
On Fri, 2002-06-21 at 02:08, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> OK, I'm trying the PAM route again, since I cranked debug up a bit and
> got some interesting data...
>
> 2002-06-20 22:49:49 Authentication failed for cm099.55.234.24.lvcm.com
> (skylos.dogpawz.com) [24.234.55.99]: Unable to authenticate at present:
> Module is unknown
Sounds like one of the modules in your /etc/pam.d/exim does not actually
exist. Often, the debian-provided examples include pam_pwdb.so even
though there _is_ no pam_pwdb.so AFAIK. verify that your pam file only
uses pam modules that actually exist under /lib/security
Of course, that is just a guess :)
-Mark
>
> /etc/pam.d/exim exists containing what d-man previously suggested, as
> well as the previously mentioned PAM login parts for
> /etc/exim/exim.conf.
>
> - --
> Baloo
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQE9EsLLNtWkM9Ny9xURAraYAJ0aIpzjWkMxa92ZDnbBoNL6ZP5IpACdHmZ8
> xICV8FjkR8eUiCoiebXujHg=
> =b7Yo
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: