[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: man or info?



W. Paul Mills(wpmills@Mills-USA.com) is reported to have said:
> cjwatson@debian.org (Colin Watson) writes:
> 
> > To summarize somewhat, perhaps unfairly, the GNU Project seems to
> > believe that providing a complete detailed manual is always preferable
> > to providing a reference card; the Debian Project observes that not all
> > upstream authors have the time or inclination for a complete manual and,
> > all other things being equal, prefers to have some reasonable
> > documentation for most things than excellent documentation for a few and
> > poor documentation for most.
> >
> > Man pages are things that both authors and readers can pick up quickly.
> > I'm in the habit of using info for a very few GNU packages (make,
> > autoconf, and the libc being prime examples), but given the choice I
> > still prefer a quick 'man foo'.
> 
> Seems like I never can find what I want in info. Man pages are
> much easier. Then again a friendlier info browser might help.

Have you tried pinfo?

Description: An alternative info-file viewer
 pinfo is an viewer for Info documents, which is based on ncurses.
 The key-commands are in the style of lynx.

-- 
Computer Science: solving today's problems tomorrow.
_______________________________________________________


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: