Re: xemacs problems
On 24-May-2002 Glen Lee Edwards wrote:
> Adam,
>
> I'm not going to rewrite the lisp code on xemacs to automatically add in a
> Reply-to: header that matches one of the dozen or so email addresses I use.
> All
> my boxes have their own static IP address, and a reverse DNS lookup matches
> the
> DSN address to the machine and my userid. If that isn't good enough, I
> suggest
> you just add me to your spam list and block all my mail. Anybody spammer can
> add in a bogus Reply-to: header.
>
> Don't take this personally. If some programmer thinks that just because a
> Reply-to: header exists that this is proof it isn't spam, then he's the
> problem,
> not me.
>
Then kill then Reply-To header line. You make it more difficult to respond to
you because most mailers want to use Reply-To if it is listed.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: