Re: Is it perfectly to pass argv[] this way to function ?

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Is it perfectly to pass argv[] this way to function ?
From: Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 16:34:56 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 87sn4mlfrj.fsf@wesley.springies.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020520194222.GA8337@crdic.ath.cx>
References: <[🔎] 000a01c2002c$d8ebfaa0$fca6c7cb@vsnl.net> <[🔎] 20020520194222.GA8337@crdic.ath.cx>

Craig Dickson <crdic@pacbell.net> writes:

> I think the convention that argv[argc] == NULL is common enough that
> this should be acceptable in practice, but I'm not sure it's actually in
> the C89 standard,

FWIW, it is.  Section 5.1.2.2.1.

-- 
Alan Shutko <ats@acm.org> - In a variety of flavors!
We are Microsoft.  Resistance Is Futile. You Will Be Assimilated.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Is it perfectly to pass argv[] this way to function ?
  - From: "Deepak Kotian" <dkotian3@vsnl.net>
- Re: Is it perfectly to pass argv[] this way to function ?
  - From: Craig Dickson <crdic@pacbell.net>

Prev by Date: Re: how does root run a graphical prog
Next by Date: Re: Is it perfectly to pass argv[] this way to function ?
Previous by thread: Re: Is it perfectly to pass argv[] this way to function ?
Next by thread: Re: Is it perfectly to pass argv[] this way to function ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread