Re: Blocking 'unsubscribe'
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 10:05:40AM -0500, Richard Cobbe wrote:
> Lo, on Sunday, May 19, Michael C Alonzo did write:
>
> > Osamu Aoki wrote this message last Sun, May 19, 2002 at 06:17:29AM -0700:
> > > On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 08:56:32PM +0800, Michael C Alonzo wrote:
>
> > > # blackhole for autoresponders
> > > :0
> > > * 1^0 ^From:.*spam_filter@linuxfreemail.com
> > > * 1^0 ^Subject: Automated reply from
> > > * 1^0 ^Subject: subscribe
> > > * 1^0 ^Subject: unsubscribe
> > > /dev/null
> >
> > what does 1^0 mean?
>
> Procmail's weighted scoring rules. See procmailsc(1) for details.
>
> I'm not entirely sure why it's useful in this case, though.
Procmail rules are "AND" if listed. Above bunch up similar rules as
"OR".
Question is "Do you want 4 rules?" Or single rule with "OR"?
:0
* ^From:.*spam_filter@linuxfreemail.com
/dev/null
:0
* ^Subject: Automated reply from
/dev/null
:0
* ^Subject: subscribe
/dev/null
:0
* ^Subject: unsubscribe
/dev/null
Yes this does same thing.
--
~\^o^/~~~ ~\^.^/~~~ ~\^*^/~~~ ~\^_^/~~~ ~\^+^/~~~ ~\^:^/~~~ ~\^v^/~~~ +++++
Osamu Aoki @ Cupertino CA USA
See "User's Guide": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/users-guide/
See "Debian reference": http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/
"Debian reference" Project at: http://qref.sf.net
I welcome your constructive criticisms and corrections.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: