[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: printing problems



Thanks for the Cups suggestion.  I've now spent a little time evaluating
that pathway.  It smells a little like bait and switch.

I have three printers - a 300 dpi HP LaserJet III, a 600 dpi HP LaserJet
4, and a 1200 dpi HP 8100 DN with duplexer.  The later printer is used for
data sheets, manuals, and catalogs, printed on 11 by 17 sheets.  All
printers accept PostScript.  What I need to do is move PostScript files to
them . . . period.

What I don't need is something sitting between the document and the
printer that limits resolution to 600 dpi.  Of course I can pony up a few
farthings and get support for 1200 dpi, but --- I originally managed to
get lprng working under RH, so I think I'll spend some more time trying to
get it working with Debian.

Yes, the interface is nice, but in my case it's like using a flame thrower
to make toast.

-- 
Sincerely,

David Smead
http://www.amplepower.com.

On Fri, 26 Apr 2002, dman wrote:

> On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 10:13:15PM -0700, David Smead wrote:
> | I'm running Woody with the 2.4.18 kernel.  I can print using xpdq and pdq,
> | but when Iset up with lprngtool, the lpr command works in some cases and
> | not in others.
> |
> | Do these two packages interfere?  I'd prefer to use lprng so that I don't
> | have to change the print command on several remote machines, otherwise I
> | just use pdq.
>
> IMO CUPS is better.  It also provides an lpd interface so your other
> machines wouldn't even know the daemon changed.
>
> -D
>
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: