Re: Kernel panic: NO INIT FOUND, but seems to be there.
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 23:47:11 -0500, dman wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 03:22:56AM -0500, Gary Turner wrote:
>| On Tue, 23 Apr 2002 00:16:01 -0400, Andy Saxena wrote:
>| >On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 08:08:41PM -0500, dman wrote:
>| >> On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 05:21:23PM +0800, Crispin Wellington wrote:
>| >> | On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 15:08, Alessandro Ghigi wrote:
snip
>|
>| Does lilo.conf have "initrd=/initrd.img" with up-to-date link?
>
>FYI, I dislike symlinks here. I explicitly give the full name of the
>image I want to use. This way I know exactly which image a given
>entry will use and will never have it "magically" change underneath
>me. (and I use grub)
Yeah, I knew you were a GRUB fan, dman. Alessandro didn't indicate (or
I missed it) which loader he used, and his, or another's problem in the
thread was related to not finding init, and root. I had the same
problem when I moved to a pre-compiled bin pkg for 2.4.17. And so, the
lilo solution.
In re using links, would you also use full file name for the kernel
image rather than an alias? And, is a magical transformation very
likely? If so, what would do it?
--
gt
It is interesting to note that as one evil empire (generic) fell,
another Evil Empire (tm) began its nefarious rise. -- me
Coincidence? I think not.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: