Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Grant Edwards wrote:
> I notice that "woody" installs a 2.2 kernel instead of a 2.4
> kernel. Are the reasons behind that decision?
2.2 was current when woody was in development.
> Is the plan to have "stable" 3.0 run a 2.2 kernel?
Yes.
> I'm planning on building a custom-tailored 2.4.x kernel-image
> package for above-mentioned product, but I'm wondering if I
> should also include a similarly configured 2.2 kernel-image...
Your call.
--
Baloo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: