Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 02:10:17PM -0700, Xeno Campanoli wrote:
> > I did. I didn't find the answer to my question. Can you tell
> > > me which section explains the reasons why Debian still uses a
> > > 2.2.20 kernel by default instead of a 2.4 kernel like most
> > > other distros?
>
> Actually, I can't get 2.2.20 by default. I don't see it on stable, and
> last time I asked about it I was told to get it off "testing".
I installed woody last week from the floppy images and I got
2.2.20. I don't remember what I got when I installed potato
the week before.
--
Grant Edwards
grante@visi.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: