Re: Why 2.2 kernel instead of 2.4
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 01:45:46PM -0500, Donald R. Spoon wrote:
> Grant Edwards <grante@visi.com> wrote:
> > My concern is that if Debian hasn't switched to a 2.4 kernel,
> > there must be a reason. If I start shipping a product with
> > Debian running a 2.4 kernel, I don't want to find out that
> > reason from annoyed customers.
> Go over to the Developers / Debian-Boot mailing list and look for a
> thread entitled "2.4 kernel as default boot kernel on CD #1 ??" started
> around 4 April 2002, I think. This might answer some of your
> questions... dunno.
Thanks! That's _exactly_ what I was looking for. I didn't
think to look in that list. Now if I can only figure how to
download mailing list archives in mbox format so I can use mutt
to read them instead of the web-interface. Not that there's
anything particularly wrong with the web-interface, I just
don't like web interfaces in general. ;)
--
Grant Edwards
grante@visi.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: