Re: FW: Kernel identification

[Simon Hepburn <sth@blueyonder.co.uk>]

Osamu Aoki wrote:

> To avoid this kind of flustration, dselect is better tool.  With that we
> can see and confirm package names.  This is true for kernel-image since
> it evolve really fast with strange combination of name mutation.
>
> Just my thought.  (I like apt-get though)

flustration ? I've been flustered and frustrated but never 
flustrated.....sounds painful ;-)

I like dselect too, apt-get leaves you oblivious to recommends and suggests, 
which can and do change over the lifetime of a package, particulary if a 
large package is split into smaller ones.

-- 
Simon Hepburn.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org