[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: FW: Kernel identification



It seems that it must have been removed from the archive between your
installs.  2.4.17 does not exist on the archives now, only
2.4.17-b42.4.  I may be wrong but it seems to me it hasn't been there
for several weeks. I would suggest installing 2.4.18. 

On Fri, 2002-04-12 at 19:11, curtis wrote:
> Let's go back to my original problem.
> 
> Here's my letter:
> 
>     I upgraded the kernels on all of computers per instructions, which
>     are provided at the end of the message.
>     This worked on all but one computer.
>     I assumed that that computer was upgraded to 2.4, but I discovered
>     recently that it is still on the 2.2 kernel.
>     Doing an apt-get dist-upgrade produces no results now. The only
>     image in the /boot / directory (which is were it should be, right?)
>     is vmlinuz-2.2.17.
>     Do I now have manually upgrade it? And if so, how?
> 
>     Curtis
> 
> 
>     Procedures for upgrade:
>     1. edit sources.list
>     2. apt-get update
>     3. apt-get install apt dpkg apt-utils
>     4. apt-get dist-upgrade
>     5. apt-get -f install
> 
> Now, since then I tried to download the kernel per instructions provided 
> by dman:
> 
> apt-get install kernel-imgage-<version>
> 
> In this case, when I type apt-get install kernal-image-2.4.17-386 (the 
> kernel version on my other computers), I get the following message:
> 
>     Package kernel-image-2.4.17-386 has no available version, but exists
>     in the database.
>     This typically means that the package was mentioned in a dependency and
>     never uploaded, has been obsoleted or is not available with the contents
>     of sources.list
>     E: Package kernel-image-2.4.17-386 has no installation candidate
> 
> Fine, so I typed apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.17 and for whatever 
> reason it installed kernel-image-2.4.17-bf2.4.
> 
> So, how do I get the correct kernel-image?  Or what is the correct 
> title? Perhpas 2.4.19-386?
> 
> Curtis
> 
> Osamu Aoki wrote:
> 
> >Hi
> >On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 05:11:50PM -0500, dman wrote:
> >
> >>Will anyone help curtis?  I don't know about the 'bf' kernels.
> >>
> >
> >bf = boot floppy
> >
> >Special kernel flavor compiled for the initial system installation.
> >
> >It should be quite useful but may not have all the bells and whistle.
> >
> >Just install normal 2.4 kernel and configure modules to suits your
> >system.
> >
> >Good luck.
> >
> >>----- Forwarded message from curtis <curtis@npc-usa.com> -----
> >>| From: curtis <curtis@npc-usa.com>
> >>| 
> >>| After updating the kernel on one of my computers, I see that I have the 
> >>| following kernel image: vmlinuz-2.4.17-386
> >>| I then tried to update the kernel on another computer. For whatever 
> >>| reason it would not update automatically so I had to perform the 
> >>| following operation:
> >>| apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.17
> >>| 
> >>| Well, it install vmlinuz-2.4.17-bf2.4
> >>| 
> >>| I understand the 386 in the earlier kernel image install to refer to a 
> >>| 386 processor. What does the bf2.4 mean and is this appropriate?
> >>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: