Re: problem with modem connection
Hi Debianicans.
Thanx to all!
It still doesn't work,
but the message is a different one now.
See the very end of this mail.
> > Finally I made it to this distribution.
>
> Great.
>
Although there is more to do to set up Debian,
it feels better than the more "commercial" distribs.
>
> Use "ATM0" as your modem init string.
>
Works - modem is quiet now.
> > Mar 5 21:22:13 umobile chat[458]: 46666 V42bis^M
> > Mar 5 21:22:17 umobile chat[458]: ~^?}#@!}!}!} %}"}&} } } }
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> It seems that your ISP uses PAP.
How ever anyone can tell this from that line ;-)
Here is what came out of "/var/log/messages" now,
using PAP (Besides: The whole thing works well under Win 2K):
Mar 6 01:44:51 umobile pppd[4409]: pppd 2.4.1 started by root, uid 0
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: abort on (BUSY)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: abort on (NO CARRIER)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: abort on (VOICE)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: abort on (NO DIALTONE)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: abort on (NO DIAL TONE)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: abort on (NO ANSWER)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: abort on (DELAYED)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: send (ATM0^M)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: expect (OK)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: ATM0^M^M
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: OK
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: -- got it
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile chat[4410]: send (ATDT019389687^M)
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile pppd[4409]: Serial connection established.
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile pppd[4409]: Using interface ppp0
Mar 6 01:44:53 umobile pppd[4409]: Connect: ppp0 <--> /dev/modem
Mar 6 01:45:24 umobile pppd[4409]: LCP: timeout sending Config-Requests
Mar 6 01:45:24 umobile pppd[4409]: Connection terminated.
Mar 6 01:45:24 umobile pppd[4409]: Receive serial link is not 8-bit clean:
Mar 6 01:45:24 umobile pppd[4409]: Problem: all had bit 7 set to 0
Mar 6 01:45:25 umobile pppd[4409]: Exit.
Additionaly Tom Cook suggests to add ATL0 to the chat script.
How do I actually pass multiple AT commands to the init line:
Like this:
ATM0 ATL0
or like this
ATM0;ATL0
?
(I still have no clue what's going on,
I'm certainly not a power user ...)
Bye. (:-)
Ulf Martin
ulf.martin@gmx.net
Reply to: