Re: Which Kernel 2.4.* or 2.2
On Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:23:40 +0100 Tim Dijkstra <tim@BLUHBLAH.famdijkstra.org> wrote:
> Is there any reason, not to run a 2.4.* kernel?
There are those who think that 2.2 is more stable than 2.4 in
production server environments.
Being a home user, I haven't had any problems with 2.4, starting
with 2.4.3, up to 2.4.17.
--
+------------------------------------------------------------+
| Ron Johnson, Jr. Home: ron.l.johnson@cox.net |
| Jefferson, LA USA http://ronandheather.dhs.org:81 |
| |
| 484,246 sq mi are needed for 6 billion people to live, 4 !
! persons per lot, in lots that are 60'x150'. |
! That is ~ California, Texas and Missouri. !
! Alternatively, France, Spain and The United Kingdom. |
+------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: