On Sat, 2 Feb 2002, dman wrote:
> No he isn't. He's been a helpful member of this list for quite some
Used to have the email firstname.lastname@example.org and my tech IDs were
4263G and 6918B, before and after the Beaverton office moved.
> You can't claim that he didn't see what he saw. You did notice
> that he didn't say *you* in particular were proud, just that all the
> outlook users he's worked with were.
Thinking back, I remember one Outlook user who was clueful, and he was
giving us a heads-up about a server that had *just* crashed (one of the
ancient NT machines in Illinois someone missed in the migration to
Solaris, if I remember correctly).