[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: woody & evolution



Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:

> Hi,
> 
> Anyone know an *approximate* date as to when evolution will move out of
> sid and into woody?

from http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html :

* evolution (- to 1.0.1-1)

    * Maintainer: Takuo KITAME
    * Too young, only 0 of 2 days old
    * out of date on alpha: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
    * out of date on arm: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
    * evolution/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libgal19 (>= 0.19) ['gal']
    * evolution/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libgnome-pilot1 (>= 0.1.63) ['gnome-pilot']
    * evolution/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkhtml20 (>= 1.0.1) ['gtkhtml']
    * libcamel0/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libgal19 (>= 0.19) ['gal']
    * out of date on ia64: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
    * out of date on m68k: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
    * out of date on powerpc: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
    * out of date on s390: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
    * out of date on sparc: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
    * Not considered
    * Depends: evolution gal
    * Depends: evolution gnome-pilot
    * Depends: evolution gtkhtml

Doesn't look good...  I doubt it will ever make it into Woody.

> Or, is woody in feature freeze?

I think only "base" packages are frozen.

-- 
Brian Nelson <nelson@bignachos.com>



Reply to: