Re: woody & evolution
Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net> writes:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone know an *approximate* date as to when evolution will move out of
> sid and into woody?
from http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html :
* evolution (- to 1.0.1-1)
* Maintainer: Takuo KITAME
* Too young, only 0 of 2 days old
* out of date on alpha: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
* out of date on arm: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
* evolution/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libgal19 (>= 0.19) ['gal']
* evolution/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libgnome-pilot1 (>= 0.1.63) ['gnome-pilot']
* evolution/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libgtkhtml20 (>= 1.0.1) ['gtkhtml']
* libcamel0/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libgal19 (>= 0.19) ['gal']
* out of date on ia64: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
* out of date on m68k: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
* out of date on powerpc: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
* out of date on s390: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
* out of date on sparc: evolution, evolution-dev, libcamel-dev, libcamel0 (from 1.0-5)
* Not considered
* Depends: evolution gal
* Depends: evolution gnome-pilot
* Depends: evolution gtkhtml
Doesn't look good... I doubt it will ever make it into Woody.
> Or, is woody in feature freeze?
I think only "base" packages are frozen.
--
Brian Nelson <nelson@bignachos.com>
Reply to: