Re: Network config problem
On Sunday 09 December 2001 02:53, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> You want:
> auto ethWHATEVER
> iface inet dhcp ethWHATEVER
> instead of "static dhcp" which, I'm not even sure how it would be
> parsed by ifup. ifconfig should tell you if your interface iseven
> being brought up.
My fault here, sorry, it is if fact configured that way:
iface eth1 inet dhcp
hostname pump
I read 'static' form the interface eth0 and wrote things down wrong.
> Assuming it's coming up and has an ip address, check your
As far as I can tell from ifconfig's output, it's up and has the
correct IP, broadcast and netmask.
> /var/dhcp/dhclient.leases file for a routers entry. If you have no
My system is now Potato 2.2r0 and this file doesn't even exist. Note
that I'm using pump as dhcp client, I don't know if this is relevant.
Querying pump for the status of the interface (pump -i eth1 --status)
shows that eth1 is fully configured.
> route add default ethWHATEVER
This is a good clue !! My old one-diskette system has a routing
table like this:
Destination Gateway Netmask Iface
10.7.2.1 * 255.255.255.255 eth1
192.168.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 eth0
200.70.32.0 * 255.255.255.0 eth1
default 10.7.2.1 0.0.0.0 eth1
The recently installed Potato system's table has:
Destination Gateway Netmask Iface
localnet * 255.255.255.0 eth0
200.70.32.0 * 255.255.255.0 eth1
It's strange to me that 'pump -i eth1 --status' shows correctly the
gateway (10.7.2.1), nameservers, etc. So I tried to add the two missing
entries, and it failed.
root:> route add default gw 10.7.2.1 dev eth1
SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
and:
root:> route add 10.7.2.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 dev eth1
dboostrap_settings: Unknown host
I guess perhaps the initialization scripts also tried to set up the
correct routing entries and failed.
Any further suggestions ??
Thanks for your help !!
Daniel
--
"There is no spoon..." - The Matrix
Reply to: