Re: OT: mysql vs. postgresql
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 02:58:18PM -0800, Karsten M. Self wrote:
>
> The usual criticism of MySQL is that it is not ACID.
But it is. Use InnoDB tables.
> For quick, temporary, storage, MySQL may be a fit. For robust
> database use, it's probably not advisable.
We have hundreds of queries per second hitting MySQL (with at least
one table having more than 260,000,000 rows in it) all the time at
work. No real problems. If we need transactions, they're there.
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<Jeremy@Zawodny.com> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
Reply to: