Re: dd /dev/hda /dev/hdb block size

To: "Debian" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: dd /dev/hda /dev/hdb block size
From: "Mark Lanett" <mlanett@parrotchat.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 13:49:42 -0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 002d01c18fe9$8e9d25e0$aca8a8c0@parrotchat.net>
References: <[🔎] 1009491709.767.0.camel@buddha> <[🔎] 3C2C2A26.6DC3372B@mclink.net> <[🔎] 003701c18f7c$f95812e0$aca8a8c0@parrotchat.net> <[🔎] 20011228223321.A1680@animus.fel.iae.nl>

> FUD!  Tar does handle hard links!
> Try it, before misleading innocent people:)

Well that's good. So why doesn't the --help or man page mention it?

~mark

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dd /dev/hda /dev/hdb block size
  - From: Carel Fellinger <cfelling@iae.nl>

References:
- dd /dev/hda /dev/hdb block size
  - From: Lance Hoffmeyer <lance@augustmail.com>
- Re: dd /dev/hda /dev/hdb block size
  - From: Pietro Cagnoni <pcagnoni@mclink.net>
- Re: dd /dev/hda /dev/hdb block size
  - From: "Mark Lanett" <mlanett@parrotchat.net>
- Re: dd /dev/hda /dev/hdb block size
  - From: Carel Fellinger <cfelling@iae.nl>

Prev by Date: Re: Python mx.DateTime
Next by Date: Fonts' strategy
Previous by thread: Re: dd /dev/hda /dev/hdb block size
Next by thread: Re: dd /dev/hda /dev/hdb block size
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread