RE: Email client programs (w/o html formatting - sorry)
On Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Vaughan, Curtis wrote:
> One of the reasons is monetary. Why pay MS for what is already out there,
> and works just as well?
> The other reason is example. We know of another company that is totally
> Linux-based and has no problems. They can work not just at work, but also
> from home or from any computer anywhere through a web browser.
>
> Actually we are using Terminal Services. The 1 user who is on a Linux box
> is only on it because he is using rdesktop. I use it as well.
>
> About email clients: practically no one uses scheduling in our office, so
> that's not an issue.
> Something happened with my Evolution install that left me very dissatisfied.
> I think it just crashed often.
> The email client that we adopt certainly does not have to offer the
> all-in-one possibilities of Outlook. But it does have to be stable.
in that case, I would go for evolution.
start with a clean install, and make sure you have EVERYTHING necessary
for evolution to work (use their .debs + depends).
-lev
Reply to: